How Much Assurance of Private Activities Might be Considered Publicly Acceptable?

Historic estimates of a Common Social Cost of Carbon (https://aidanparkinson.xyz/visualisation)

Capital budgeting involves a keen understanding of demand, so that plans can be made that develop affordable and secure supply-chains with an appropriate degree of quality assurance. Agents strike a balance between quality and the activities promoted through what is demanded by considering a Social Cost of Carbon. Professional best practice is to add a Social Cost of Carbon to expected fuel costs to budget for each items assurance requirements.

For reasons unknown, the process of including a Social Cost of Carbon to capital budgeting has only recently been thought worthwhile. What is concerning is that, in doing so, agents have typically understood that they can adopt a personal perspective to stipulate a rate that best suits themselves. These perspectives tend to return a Personal Social Cost of Carbon for the present that is so small it is hardly worth including in investment appraisals. For example, the Biden administration return a $51tC Personal Social Cost of Carbon. Hence, business development efforts have, on balance, favoured growth over assurance.

Any Personal Social Cost of Carbon estimate that is contingent on a Utilitarian Theory of Saving, as originally developed by Frank Ramsey, is by definition a personal rate that subjects supply-chains to an ideal observer. Such estimates also typically assume that the initial state-of-affairs reflect Utopia. In a world where private activities result in public costs, such assumptions should be regarded as entirely unacceptable. Why should the public share anything in common with an agent who believes they are an ideal observer mitigating losses from their initial Utopian ideal? It’s quite understandable that activists and the media continue to press their questions and have valid grounds for appeal. Differences in personal perspectives are in competition and contribute to conflict, stable agreement between clients is challenging.

Formula to calculate a Commons Social Cost of Carbon for any historic time-period

More general justification can be found in a Common Social Cost of Carbon that is grounded in the acknowledgement of a Hobbesian global system enforced by Sovereign states. Such perspectives are independent of which agent is observing the total system. With this common perspective, assurance costs to be added to fuel consumption through the supply-chain are significantly greater. The emphasis of business development shifts from expansion to assurance, as a greater surplus is generated from investments to be allocated to this purpose. Business cases for energy efficiency interventions to operational assets are materially more compelling and yield a higher likelihood of action to reduce waste. Uncaught Promises become a high priority focus area in all disciplines of engineering to improve integrated systems stability. By sharing common justification on these matters, activists and the media are provided with basic answers to their appeals which should mitigate conflicts. Grounds for stable agreements between agents appears sound.

Some may assert that such issues are not pressing for industry as they have marginal impacts. One might agree if it weren’t that the goods being considered, carbon dioxide emissions and the assurance of public activities, weren’t essential. Any policies that stipulate objectively under-assured supply-chains runs risks of severe problems and challenge. The consequences of failing to perform to shared understanding are simply increased levels of enforcement by States, whether judicial, or ultimately through military intervention. It is vitally important for the private sector to secure publicly acceptable supply-chains to deliver to their own demands. A Common Social Cost of Carbon appears good grounds to justify when one has made appropriate efforts to do so.

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store